Article Table of Contents
Not all sommeliers are trained to accurately taste wine. This is what we call a “fake sommelier. ” After all, the core element of the job is to have a great palate. If the job was just to bloviate, there would be a line of applicants out the door of every restaurant. Several dozen studies have been undertaken to determine if sommeliers and other wine experts are actually able to taste wine better than the average person. It has been found that only sommelier schools that focus on sensory training create successful wine tasters.
There is a lot of science to back up the fact that there are a lot of fake sommeliers out there. There’s also a lot of research that shows that the correct type of training is critical to the overall success of a sommelier. Wine education programs that focus on component and deductive tasting are the proven winners. The National Wine School calls this the “Fingerprint” and the Court of Master Sommeliers calls it “The Grid”. No matter what they call it, make sure the wine course you attend offers it.
There is a question as to who owns the trademark of “Master Sommelier.” The Court of Master Sommeliers lost a lawsuit against a former member who calls himself a Master Sommelier, despite being kicked out of the organization.
Is that Really 95 Points?
Judging wines is a surprisingly subjective experience, with even wine experts giving contradictory evaluations of wines, depending on a variety of factors. Recently, after noticing that some wines might lose some competitions and win gold medals at others, a statistician analyzed the results of several wine competitions.
In an experiment, wine experts were blindfolded and given the same wine to taste and evaluate three times. In each tasting, the tasters rated the wine on a scale of 80-100, and their ratings varied by as much as four points from one tasting to the next. A wine rated 91 in one tasting might be rated as low as 87 or as high as 95 on the next.
Not a single judge in this study was a certified sommelier, nor were any of the judges given sensory wine training. When wine judges were required to have at least a Level 3 Sommelier Certification, these issues disappeared.
Red or White Wine?
Another study found that those judges with consistent ratings in one year were far less consistent in other years, indicating that consistent performance by a judge is simply luck. It’s worth repeating that these weren’t random people off the street, but expert judges at the wine competition at the California State Fair, a one of the most well-established and prestigious competitions in the country.
Expert wine judges even have trouble distinguishing red wines from white. In 2001, a study was conducted in which 54 wine experts were asked their opinions on two very different wines, a red wine and a white wine. In reality, the two wines were actually the same white wine, one with food coloring added.
Not a single one of the experts noticed that the wines were the same, and described the red wine with words like “jammy” and other words typically reserved for red wines. The experts also remarked on flavors yielded by the “crushed red fruit.”
Is this another example of the fake sommelier syndrome?
However, this study was repeated with graduates of a sommelier program that offered sensory training. The results were completely reversed, with over 86% able to identify the wines were identical.
Fine Wine or Not?
Another study, and one that has been repeated with different wines, involved a bottle of wine labeled as a fancy grand cru and another labeled as an average vin de table. As in the earlier study, the two wines were really the same wine. The experts in this study characterized the wines in nearly opposite ways. The grand cru was described as “complex,” “balanced,” “woody,” “rounded,” and “agreeable.” The vin de table was portrayed as “weak,” “light,” “flat,” “short,” and “faulty.”
Wine ratings can be influenced by a variety of factors unrelated to the wine, including time of day, other wines tasted, and how long it’s been since the taster has eaten. Based on these factors, a taster’s rating of a given wine might vary several points from one tasting to the next.
My god, more fake sommeliers?
Again, when this study was repeated with Level 3 Sommeliers who’ve received sensory training, the results were quite different. Over 73% of the participants identified that the wines were the same. Furthermore, only 2% of the participants were influenced by factors other than the wine.
A study published in a 1996 issue of the Journal of Experimental Psychology found that wine experts were unable to reliably recognize more than about four of the flavor components of a wine, though most critics typically claim to recognize at least six.
Dear lord, the fake sommeliers are really getting on my nerves.
Further tests have shown that only well trained sommeliers can reliably recognize more than five flavors in a wine.
Who Loves Cheap Wine?
A recent meta-analysis of wine reviews conducted by a behavioral economist found that reviewers use “cheap” and “expensive” terms in very specific ways.l Cheap terms are used often, while expensive terms are used infrequently. The study found that it is possible to estimate the price of a wine based simply on the language used in the review. The researcher concluded that words used to describe expensive wines fell into three categories, specifically:
- Dark words: Words like intense, smoky, velvety, or smoky
- Exclusive sounding words: Elegant, old, or cuvee
- Single, defined flavors: Tobacco or chocolate
Less expensive wines were typically described with terms opposite to these, specifically:
- Lighter words: Pleasant or refreshing
- More common words: Value, good, clean or enjoy
- Less defined flavors: Fruity or juicy
Not only are cheap and expensive wines described differently, they are also paired with different foods. Cheaper wines are more often paired with foods like chicken, pizza, or burgers, while more expensive wines might be paired with shellfish, pork, or steak.
These fake sommeliers are really snotty, aren’t they?
A 2008 study of more than 6,000 blind tastings found that those with wine training were more likely to enjoy expensive wines more than cheaper wines. In other words, if you aren’t attending a wine school –especially one with a sensory training element– you may not appreciate all the complexities of fine wine.
Education is Everything
Bottom line: if you love wine, you owe it to yourself to become educated. In this day and age where wine programs are available across the country, there isn’t any excuse to not sign up for a sommelier course at your local wine school.
Is there a verifiable list that indicates who is a TRUE Sommelier? I know of someone touting this title, but is doing nothing more conducting an occasional wine tour of IN. What would be the repercussions of making a false claim online?
I would recommend asking them what school did they study at, and what accreditation that received.
“Bottom line: if you love wine, you owe it to yourself to become educated.” WHat?
If you love wine just shut up and drink it. Wine is awesome. I don’t need to become educated to enjoy icecream and shawarma. Why do you need this bullshit for wine? Expensive wines, cheap wines – no matter, you just can find wine that you like and drink it. And you better not pay more than 15$ for bottle
Would you prefer if your ice cream maker or shwarma cook had no training? This site focusses on professional certifications.
All of the current wine organizations promoting certifications are for-profit companies, and blind tasting wine is nothing more than a parlor trick. Biggest scam ever. Buy a couple good books and make yourself a real expert.
Hi there, do you know if the studies you were referring to involving better-trained subjects ever got accepted for publication? Even if not, would love to have researcher names. I’ve always been curious about this and was psyched to see that someone at least tried to replicate the famous studies calling BS on the experts.
Actually, blind tasting is a critical skillset that winemakers use all the time.
Hi, I ran across your page while researching wine tasting statistic results
I am highly interested in the fact that you have results from advanced certified sommeliers that seem to indicate the testing methodologies of the popularly cited research is flawed. Can you provide me with any sources on those results?
We are working on a few articles that will include the original research. There is also a paper submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. I’ll update this reply once we have links.
Do you have the links now? Because I would love to read the actual sources. Otherwise your post isn’t very believable
Wine is just a living organism…
Many factors could affect the taste…
It’s all about the retuals…
You cite several tests supposedly disproving other well-known tests that in their turn show the gross inconsistency in wine evaluation/appreciation, but you provide no data whatsoever on the “disproving” tests. And then: what`s the use if only a well-trained sommelier can taste the varieties? I’m the one who`s gonna drink the wine …