SOMM publishes editorial reviews of wine schools and certification programs operating in the United States and internationally. Our reviews are intended to help readers understand how different programs approach curriculum design, instruction, and professional training.
Each school receives a score on a 100-point editorial scale. Scores reflect comparative analysis across three broad areas that strongly influence the student experience:
• school fundamentals
• institutional structure and accreditation
• student outcomes and satisfaction
These scores represent editorial assessments based on publicly available information, program materials, classroom observation when possible, and feedback from students and industry professionals.
School Fundamentals
Wine education has evolved significantly over the past two decades. Earlier wine classes were often informal events held in retail stores or restaurants. Today, many wine schools operate dedicated education facilities with structured curricula and multi-level certification programs.
In our reviews, we examine the overall educational environment of each school. Factors considered include:
• classroom facilities designed for wine education
• tasting and instructional infrastructure
• curriculum structure and course sequencing
• the experience and background of instructors
Instructor quality is particularly important. While there is no single pathway to becoming a strong wine educator, many effective instructors combine industry experience with formal wine training and academic study.
Institutional Structure and Accreditation
Wine education programs operate under a variety of institutional models. Some schools are affiliated with universities or accredited educational institutions, while others operate independently or deliver training through industry certification programs.
SOMM examines how schools structure their programs and what types of credentials they offer. These may include:
• university degree programs that incorporate wine education
• state-licensed educational programs
• professional certification programs offered through industry organizations
Different types of credentials serve different purposes within the wine trade, and prospective students should consider which format best aligns with their career goals.
Student Satisfaction and Outcomes
A school’s success is often reflected in the experiences of its students and alumni.
To better understand student outcomes, we review a range of publicly available indicators, including:
• alumni career paths within the wine trade
• student reviews and feedback across multiple platforms
• professional networking data where available
These signals help us estimate how well a program prepares students for careers in hospitality, retail, distribution, education, and other sectors of the wine industry.
Important Context
Wine education in the United States operates within a decentralized system of schools, certification bodies, and training programs. Because of this diversity, different institutions emphasize different teaching styles, credential structures, and career pathways.
SOMM’s reviews are intended to provide comparative editorial analysis, helping readers better understand how wine education programs differ and what they offer prospective students.
Editorial note: SOMM is an editorial publication supported by the National Wine School.